Senses of Place<\/em>, edited by Stephen Feld and Keith Basso (Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 1996), 91-136. This is a tall order, and the desire for such an integrated approach raises the question of whether the text and the spoken word, the two conventional forms of academic knowledge, are up to the task.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\nThe “crisis of representation” in anthropology has led to experimenting with textual forms, tropes, and styles. In part, this experiment has been driven by the desire to tend to modes of experience and knowledge not easily attainable through traditional forms of scholarly writing. It may be that there is a fundamental incommensurability between sensory experience and knowledge and the academic text; can visual, auditory, and tactile experience be conveyed through linguistic means? Perhaps innovative and experimental forms of writing will prove effective, but “as some scholars are searching for parity among the senses” we might consider a “greater parity among modes of academic expression” (Quoting David MacDougall, The Corporal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses<\/em> (Princeton University Press, 2006), 60). Multimedia scholarship offers a chance for experimentation.<\/p>\nWriting is a cumulative, aggregative medium; photography a composite medium; film is both sequential and composite. What this means is that it is well nigh impossible to convey the interpenetration of sensory domains in a text. In a text, you have to do each one at a time; in the film, the simultaneity or co-presentation of sound and image are a more faithful representation of the original sensory environment. Appearance, sound, motion, texture, volume, space-these can be perceived, in unison, through film. Like a strong smell, a film or a photograph has an immediate, brute, sensual presence that words lack. They also have a transcultural quality: everyone can look at a photograph or watch a piece of video, not everyone can read a text. If a text communicates, images and film implicate; a film implicates subject, spectator, and filmmaker-a process that favors experience over explanation. A film or image is not an unadulterated revelation of some objective reality; but it is a less conventionalized system of signification and representation then is writing. Herein rests its power for studying ritual, place, social environments, the senses, imagination, identity. This is not simply a question of new avenues of interest but of new kinds of understandings, made possible by alternate means of approach and expression. The move to expand the range of phenomena we study is based on what anthropologist Nicolas Thomas calls the epistemology of quantity. Thomas writes: “Defects are absences that can be rectified through the addition of further information, and more can be known about a particular topic by adding other ways of perceiving it. \u2018Bias’ is thus associated with a lack that can be rectified or balanced out by the addition of further perspectives.” See Nicholas Thomas, “Against Ethnography,” Cultural Anthropology <\/em>6.3 (1991): 306-22. If academia has privileged the textual, tending to the sensory dimensions of social-cultural life, like tending to visual and material culture, ritual and performance, emotion, imagination, gesture, place, landscape, promises greater comprehensiveness.<\/p>\n\n- <\/u>James Clifford, Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century<\/em>(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997), 12.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>The German “Wende”<\/em>is often rendered into English as “peaceful revolution,” though the term literally means “change.” Wende also means turn. Thus a Novelle has a Wendepunkt. In the context of the collapse of communism, the term refers to moments of great import in history.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Luther’s Wedding unfolds around a spine of events related to the wedding of Luther and Katharina von Bora. Luther’s writing against celibacy led many monks and nuns to renounce their vows, an act that was punishable by death. At Easter of 1523, von Bora and eleven other nuns fled from Nimbschen convent to Wittenberg. The Renaissance painter Lucas Cranach aided von Bora and she and Luther would eventually marry on June 27, 1527, after a two-week engagement. In the nineteenth century, images, books, plays, and souvenirs based on Luther’s Wedding became popular in Lutheran communities, providing a sedimented tradition upon which the contemporary festival implicitly draws.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Peter Burke, Popular Culture in Early Modern Europe<\/em>(New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1978), 179. Burke discusses the distinction between the “great” and “little” tradition, or “popular” and “high” culture (23\u201329). Burke brushes off Robert Redfield’s (Peasant Society and Culture<\/em>, 1956) distinction between “little” and “great” traditions by correcting Redfield’s assumption that social elites did not partake in popular culture.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Burke, 186.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Burke, 208-209. The excerpt here is from Burke’s chapter, titled, “The Triumph of Lent: the Reform of Popular Culture.”<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Richard Schechner, Performance Theory<\/em>(New York: Routledge, 2003), 114.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>See, for example, Robert Bellah et al., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life<\/em>(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Richard Sennett, Fall of Public Man<\/em>(New York: W.W. Norton, 1992), 12-15.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Terry Eagleton, The Gatekeeper<\/em>(New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2001), 113.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Ivan Illich, Tools for Conviviality<\/em>(New York: Harper and Row, 1973), 11-23.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Mikhail Bakhtin, Rabelais and his World<\/em>, translated by Helene Iswolsky (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1968), 9.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Bakhtin, 9.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Michael Cahn, “Subversive Mimesis: Theodore Adorno and the Modern Impasse of Critique.” In Mimesis in Contemporary Theory<\/em>, 27-64, edited by Mihai Spariosu (Philadelphia, John Benjamin’s Publishing, 1984), 34.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>See Michael Taussig, Mimesis and Alterity <\/em>(New York: Routledge, 1993), 20-21.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Tausig, 68.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>John MacAloon, “Olympic Games and the Theory of Spectacle in Modern Societies.” In Rite, Drama, Festival, Spectacle<\/em>(Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1984), 243-246.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle<\/em>(New York: Zone Books, 1995), 113.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Charles Taylor, “Modern Social Imaginaries,” Popular Culture<\/em>14.1 (2002): 91.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Arjun Appadurai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization<\/em>(Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), 3-7.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Frank E. Manning, The Celebration of Society<\/em>(Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Press, 1983), 4.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Jeremy Boissevain, Revitalizing European Ritual<\/em>(New York: Routledge, 1992) a collection of case studies on the resurgence of traditional celebrations across Europe.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Richard Schechner, Between Theatre and Anthropology<\/em>(Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985), 36-38.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Burke, 213.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Charles Taylor, A Secular Age<\/em>(Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007), 50-51.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Victor Turner, Dramas, Fields and Metaphors (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1974), 274.<\/li>\n
- <\/u>Taylor, A Secular Age<\/em>, 482-483.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Download PDF: Stephenson, Luther’s Wedding ABSTRACT Since 1994, the city of Wittenberg, in what was formerly the German Democratic Republic, has hosted an annual “Luther’s Wedding” festival. This carnivalesque city festival represents and actualizes the city’s imagination of itself, and<\/p>\n
Continue Reading<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":1752,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,71],"tags":[473,471,472],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/0400-G-Carnival-and-Lent.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1741"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1741"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1741\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2681,"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1741\/revisions\/2681"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmcleanup.ecdsdev.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}